https://ak3.sarpras.unair.ac.id/assets/rekomendasi/ https://bce.unpad.ac.id/top/ https://pendfisika.ulm.ac.id/wp-content/thai/ https://sapasko.kemenpora.go.id/ https://ak3.sarpras.unair.ac.id/assets/berita/ https://lms.stmik-dci.ac.id/blog/cache/ https://elitbang.depok.go.id/user/sbo/ http://p4m.pnl.ac.id/ https://pastiberaksi.sulselprov.go.id/ https://elitbang.depok.go.id/ https://wonosari.bondowosokab.go.id/pelayanan/ slot gacor situs slot gacor pertanian.bondowosokab.go.id/ https://elitbang.depok.go.id/assets/ https://simaster.wonosobokab.go.id/obc4d/ https://cms-bpsdubm.kemenkumham.go.id/json/ https://elakip2023.slemankab.go.id/modules/obc4d/ https://kinerja.iainambon.ac.id/ https://corinnemartin.com/ https://thedevilsrejects.com/ https://www.ehazira.net/ https://henantwinespirits.com/ https://majormagnetgame.com/ https://grunkamunka.com/ https://villatente.com/ https://exper-tr.com/ https://bkd.iainambon.ac.id/assets/ https://mi.aikom.ac.id/assets/ https://www.gorevdeyukselmesinavi.com.tr/ https://bkad.bengkuluutarakab.go.id/wp-content/themes/ https://compchem.ub.ac.id/ https://pastiberaksi.sulselprov.go.id/sgacor/ https://lihtr.unair.ac.id/assets/ https://geliatairlangga.unair.ac.id/toto/ https://e-kkn.unila.ac.id/assets/ https://simlp2mv2.unm.ac.id/gacor/ https://e-kkn.unila.ac.id/gacor/ https://e-kkn.unila.ac.id/about/ https://pafirembang.com/ https://pafijaktim.org/ https://pafislawi.org/ https://pafilasem.org/ https://dinkes.bondowosokab.go.id/dinkes/x777/ https://guvenlunapark.com/ https://pafikediri.com/
Pengaruh Mekanisme GCG Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi Pada Perusahaan BUMN | Saputri | Jurnal Akun Nabelo: Jurnal Akuntansi Netral, Akuntabel, Objektif

Pengaruh Mekanisme GCG Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi Pada Perusahaan BUMN

Maya Aulia Saputri, Lindrianasari Lindrianasari, Yuztitya Asmaranti, Fitra Dharma

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of mechanism of good corporate governance to accounting conservatism. Mechanism of good corporate governance are represented by three variables, namely composition of the board of independent commissioners, institutional ownership, and audit committee. The population are all state-owned enterprises listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange on 2015-2016, amounting to 20 companies. The data analysis technique used multiple regression analysis. Hypothesis testing is done using multiple linear regresion. The results show that the composition of the board of independent commissioners and institutional ownership has no influence on accounting conservatism, and variable audit committee has a positive influence on accounting conservatism.


Keywords


Accounting conservatism, mechanism of good corporate governance, composition of the board of independent commissioners, institutional ownership, audit committee

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed dan Duellman. (2007). Accounting Conservatism and Board of Director Characteristics: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics. http://www.ssrn.com.

Amran dan Manaf. (2014). Board independence and accounting conservatism in Malaysian companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 164, pp. 403 – 408.

Ammy. (2016). Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi Pada Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Jurnal Ilmiah Maksitek. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 20-34.

Basu, Sudipta. (1997). The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 3- 37.

Brilianti. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Konservatisme Akuntansi Perusahaan. Accounting Analysis Journal. Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 268-275.

Chariri dan Ghozali. (2007). Teori Akuntansi. Semarang:Badan Penerbit. Universitas Diponegoro.

Danang, S. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Akuntansi. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama Anggota Ikapi.

Dewi Dan Suryanawa. (2014). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Manajerial, Leverage, Dan Financial Distress Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi.

Ghozali, Imam. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Semarang:Badan Penerbit. Universitas Diponegoro.

Givoly dan Hayn. (2002). The Rewards to Meeting or Beating Earnings Expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Vol. 33, pp. 173–204.

Indriantoro dan Supomo. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Jao Dan Ho. (2019). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Dan Debt Covenant Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-13.

Jensen dan Meckling. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost,and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 3, pp.  305-360.

Lasdi, Ludovicus. (2009). Pengujian Determinan Konservatisma Akuntansi . Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp 1-20.

Majeed dan Wang. (2017). Product market competition, regulatory changes, ownership structure and accounting conservatism. Chinese Management Studies Vol. 11, No. 4,  pp. 658-688.

Nasr dan Ntim. (2018). Corporate Governance. Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 386-407.

Nirmala, Ronna. (2019). Pencatatan janggal atas laba Garuda Indonesia. https://beritagar.id/artikel/berita/pencatatan-janggal-atas-laba-garuda-indonesia. Diakses 14 Juli 2019.

Ongki dan Pangestu. (2018). Determinan Dan Konsekuensi Konservatisme Akuntansi: Mekanisme Corporate Governance Dan Manajemen Laba. BALANCE. Vol. 15, No.1, pp. 90-112.

Padmawati dan Fachrurrozie. (2015). Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance Dan Kualitas Audit Terhadap Tingkat Konservatisme Akuntansi. Accounting Analysis Journal. Vol. 4, No. 1, pp.1-11.

Peraturan Bapepam Nomor Kep29/PM/2004

Pratanda dan Kusmuriyanto. (2014). Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance, Likuiditas, Profitabilitas, Dan Leverage Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Accounting Analysis Journal. Vo. 3, No.2, pp. 255-263.

Putra et al. (2015). Tingkat Konservatisme Akuntansi: Kajian Dewan Komisaris, Modal Manajerial, Dan Komite Audit Dalam Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. Vol. 12, No.1, pp. 93-110.

Putra et al. (2019). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional Dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Pada Konservatisme Akuntansi. Wacana Ekonomi. Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 41–51.

Ryan dan Watts. 2007. The Information Role of Conservatism. www.ssrn.com

Sari dan Adhariani. 2009. Konservatisme perusahaan di Indonesia dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XII.

Savitri, Enni. (2016). Konservatisme Akuntansi. Yogyakarta:Pustaka Sahila.

Sembiring. (2012). Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, Perbankan Dan Akuntansi. Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 31–44.

Wardhani, Ratna. (2008). Tingkat Konservatisme Akuntansi di Indonesia dan Hubungannya dengan Karakteristik Dewan sebagai Salah Satu Mekanisme Corporate Governance. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XI. pp. 1-26.

Watts. (2003). Conservatism in Accounting part 1: Explanation and Implication.

          http://www.ssrn.com. pp. 1-31.

Wijaya dan  Reily. (2017). Tiga Kementerian Paling Banyak Rangkap Jabatan Komisaris BUMN,  https://katadata.co.id/berita/2017/06/07/tiga-kementerian-paling-banyak-rangkap-jabatan-komisaris-bumn.

www.idx.co.id

Yunos et al. (2014). The influence of internal governance mechanisms on accounting conservatism. Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 164, pp. 501 – 507.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.