Andi Intan Purnamasari, Awaliyah Awaliyah, Fidyah Paramita Utami


Data shows that 24 cases in Central Sulawesi in 2019 were all sentenced to prison or imprisonment which is still the favorite type of sanction. How not, even 18 of the 24 cases did not need to serve a period of detention, but underwent various probationary periods, at least 1 month of probation and a maximum of 12 months. However, it needs to be realized that if the imposition of this criminal sanction does not need to be implemented, why should it impose sanctions in the form of conventional punishment, the answer is of course because the legality principle only gives room to the criminal, so it is necessary to have an alternative description of what the maker can use the law in formulating the sanctions for resolving election criminal acts as an effort to redesign the model for tackling election crime in Indonesia, particularly in the Central Sulawesi region. The issue in this research covers criminalization in case study election crimes in Central Sulawesi with the perspective of ius constitutum and alternative punishment in case study election crimes in central Sulawesi from the perspective of ius constituendum. The research method uses normative juridical research methods. The results achieved are that the type of Election Crime as an ius constitutum still uses the conventional system, so to achieve the ius constituendum it is necessary to modify the sanctions in the form of alternative types of sanctions that are more efficient, such as the cancellation sanction as a candidate for candidate in the election contest.


Election and Conventional; Redesign; Sanction

Full Text:



Arifin, F., n.d. PENEGAKAN HUKUM PEMILU: TINJAUAN ATAS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU, Jurnal Hukurn PRIOR1S. Vol. 4/No. 3/2015. Faudji, A.R., n.d. KEWENANGAN KEPOLISIAN DALAM PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU DI DAERAH, Lex Administratum, Vol. III/No. 4/Juni/2015 Ariyanti, Vivi. “Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia yang Berkeadilan Gender dalam Ranah Kebijakan Formulasi, Aplikasi, dan Eksekusi.” Halu Oleo Law Review 3, no. 2 (September 19, 2019): 178. Fahmi, Khairul. “Sistem Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemilu.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (May 20, 2016): 264. Saputra, Asbudi Dwi. “Penerapan Sanksi Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilu bagi Penyelenggara Pemilu.” PLENO JURE 9, no. 2 (October 30, 2020): 129–42. Sastera, I Gusti Bagus Yoga, I Made Minggu Widyantara, and Luh Putu Suryani. “Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemilu di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 1, no. 1 (August 27, 2020): 192–96. Wibawa, Iskandar. “PIDANA KERJA SOSIAL DAN RESTITUSI SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PIDANA PENJARA DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA.” Jurnal Media Hukum 24, no. 2 (2017). Santoso, T., 2017. PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU DI INDONESIA. JHP 33, 268., Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Vol 33/No.2/Juni/2003 Wibawa, Iskandar. “PIDANA KERJA SOSIAL DAN RESTITUSI SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PIDANA PENJARA DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA.” Jurnal Media Hukum 24, no. 2 (2017). Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) Undang-undang nomor 8 tahun 2012 tentang Pemilihan Umum Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Undang-undang nomor 7 tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter

Flag Counter