STUDY ON THE DECISION OF JUDGE "NO.84 / PID-SUS /2017/PN.DONGGALA” ABOUT NARCOTICS ABUSE

Doddy Tisna Amijaya Buheli

Abstract


The research problem was the legal consideration of judge in decide verdictforconvict based on court decisionnumber: 84/Pid-Sus/2017/PN. Donggala andlegal consequences of the conviction decision number: 84/Pid-Sus/2017/Donggala wereimposed on convicted person The objective of this research is to find out and to analyze the legal consideration of judge in decide verdictforconvict based on court decision number:84/Pid-Sus/2017/PN. Donggala and to find out and analyze the legal consequences of conviction decision imposed on convicted person. The research used normative research method and qualitative research type. The result of the research show that the consideration of judge in imposeconviction decision is based onverification in a case carried out by a claimant based on proven legal facts. Based on thedefendantstatements, witness statements and evidence, existing legal facts have proven to be legitimate and convincing guilty of committing a criminal act "Criminal Agreement without the Right to Submit Narcotics Group I in accordance with consideration of juridical and non-juridical and legal consequence with the verdict conviction of the defendant in a narcotics crime, namely: conviction and fines on the defendant and reduced punishment while serving detentionand confiscation of evidence. The prosecutor and defendantmay submit an appeal attempt strengthened by the decision. It is recommended for the panel of judges to impose a punishment onthe defendant must have confidence that the defendant is legally and convincingly committing a crime based on the evidence that follow the justice process, prioritizing the instrumentsand systemof evidence or facts revealed at the justice impose maximum criminal sanctions on the defendant as a deterrent effect.


Keywords


Abuse; Criminalization; Narcotics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Darmoko Yuti Witanto dan Arya Putra Negara Kutawaringin, 2013, Diskresi Hakim: Sebuah InstrumenMenegakkan Keadilan Substantif dalam Perkara-perkara Pidana, Bandung, Alfabeta

 

Jan Remmelink. 2003. Hukum Pidana (Komentar atas Pasal-pasal Terpenting dariKitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-undang Pidana Indonesia), Jakarta, Gramedia Pustaka.

 

Leden Marpaung, 2012, Asas Teori Praktik Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Ketujuh, Jakarta,  Sinar Grafika

 

Prasetyo Teguh, 2011, Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Raja Gravindo Persada

 

Romli Atmasasmita, 1997, Tindak Pidana Narkotika Transnasional Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Imdonesia, Bandung, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti

 

Subagyo Partodiharjo.2009, Kenali Narkoba dan Musuhi Penyalahgunaannya. Surabaya, Esensi

 

Perundang-undangan:

 

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika

 

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

 

 

 

Jurnal, Tesis Dan Internet:

 

Novia Isabella Puspitasari, 2014, Putusan Pemidanaan Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika Terhadap Terdakwa Mahasiswa (Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan No. 02/Pid.Sus/2012/PN.Pwt), Purwokerto, Skripsi, Universitas Jendral Sudirman

 

Rio Sungsang Wienahyu, 2012,Penerapan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Terhadap Pengguna (Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto Nomor : 68/Pid.Sus/2011/Pn.Pwt)

 

https://daidonatus.wordpress.com/2014/01/28/pengertian-penyelidik-dan-penyidik/


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

StatCounter

Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter

Flag Counter