https://ak3.sarpras.unair.ac.id/assets/rekomendasi/ https://bce.unpad.ac.id/top/ https://pendfisika.ulm.ac.id/wp-content/thai/ https://sapasko.kemenpora.go.id/ https://ak3.sarpras.unair.ac.id/assets/berita/ https://lms.stmik-dci.ac.id/blog/cache/ https://elitbang.depok.go.id/user/sbo/ http://p4m.pnl.ac.id/ https://pastiberaksi.sulselprov.go.id/ https://elitbang.depok.go.id/ https://wonosari.bondowosokab.go.id/pelayanan/ slot gacor situs slot gacor pertanian.bondowosokab.go.id/ https://elitbang.depok.go.id/assets/ https://simaster.wonosobokab.go.id/obc4d/ https://cms-bpsdubm.kemenkumham.go.id/json/ https://elakip2023.slemankab.go.id/modules/obc4d/ https://kinerja.iainambon.ac.id/ https://corinnemartin.com/ https://thedevilsrejects.com/ https://www.ehazira.net/ https://henantwinespirits.com/ https://majormagnetgame.com/ https://grunkamunka.com/ https://villatente.com/ https://exper-tr.com/ https://bkd.iainambon.ac.id/assets/ https://mi.aikom.ac.id/assets/ https://www.gorevdeyukselmesinavi.com.tr/ https://bkad.bengkuluutarakab.go.id/wp-content/themes/ https://compchem.ub.ac.id/ https://pastiberaksi.sulselprov.go.id/sgacor/ https://lihtr.unair.ac.id/assets/ https://geliatairlangga.unair.ac.id/toto/ https://e-kkn.unila.ac.id/assets/ https://simlp2mv2.unm.ac.id/gacor/ https://e-kkn.unila.ac.id/gacor/ https://e-kkn.unila.ac.id/about/ https://pafirembang.com/ https://pafijaktim.org/ https://pafislawi.org/ https://pafilasem.org/ https://dinkes.bondowosokab.go.id/dinkes/x777/ https://guvenlunapark.com/ https://pafikediri.com/
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE RECOGNITION OF THE RELIGION IN THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE COMMUNITY IN INDONESIA ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISIONS NUMBER 97/PUU-XIV/2016 AND 140/PUU-VII/2009 | Sihombing | Tadulako Law Review

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE RECOGNITION OF THE RELIGION IN THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE COMMUNITY IN INDONESIA ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISIONS NUMBER 97/PUU-XIV/2016 AND 140/PUU-VII/2009

Uli Parulian Sihombing, Muchammad Ali Safa'at, Tunggal Ashari Setya Negara, Aan Eko Widiarto

Abstract


This article is intended to conduct a legal research on how the constitutional courts have interpreted the meaning of the religion in the constitution of Indonesia. The author has applied normative legal reseach method by compiling and analyzing the constititonal court decisions related to the issue of the religios in the indigenous community in Indonesia. Also, the author try to raise a statutory approach and legal reasonings in the constitutional court decision to analyse the legal issues. According to the result of this legal research, the author comes to the following conclussions; the constitutional court decisions has applied and used the historic interpretation method of a religion meaning in the constitution, but the constitutional courts have come to the different result of the religion meaning in the constitution. While the constitutional court decision number 140/PUU-VII/2009 excluded the meaning of the religion in the constitution, however, the constitutional court decision number 97/PUU-XIV/2016 embarced the meaning of the religion in the constitution.

Keywords


Historic interpretation; Lex Posterior Derogat Legi Priori; Non-Discrimination; The Local Beliefs

Full Text:

PDF

References


Directorate General For Cultural Values, Art and Film, The Encyclopedia of the Penghayar Kepercayaan terhadap Tuhan Yang Maha Esa,Jakarta:Directorate General For Cultural Values, Art and Film,2006. Griffits John, Understanding Legal Pluralism: A Conceptual Description, in Legal Pluralism: Inter-Diciplinary Approach,Jakarta:Huma & Ford Foundation,2003. Isnur Muhammad et all,Religion,State & Human Rights (Process of Constitutional Review On Law Number 1/PNPS/1965),Jakarta:LBH Jakarta,2012. Irianto Soelistyowati et all, No Middle Way:Public Examination On the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1/PNPS/1965,Jakarta:ILRC,2010. ---------------------------------,Legal Pluralism In Global Perspective,in Dynamic Law : Legal Antropology,Jakarta:Yayasan Obor,2009. Greenwalt Kent,Legislation:Statutory Interpretation:20 Questions,New York:New York Foundation,1999. Higher Council of the Kaharingan (the Rusmahurngan Council),the Constitution,Palangkaraya:The Rusmahurngan Council,2011. Marzuki Peter Mahmud,Legal Research,Jakarta:Prenada Media,2014. Prasetia Heru,Cross-Border Identity:Position and Articulation of the Tolotang Community South Sulawesi, in Minority Rights Multiculturalism and Dillema of State Nation,Jakarta:Interseksi Foundation. Palguna I Dewa Gede,Constitutional Complaint : Legal Remedy For the Violation of Constitutional Rights,Jakarta:Sinar Grafika,2013. Mertokusumo Sudikno & A.Pitlo,Legal Finding Chapters,Jakarta:PT Citra Aditya Bakti,1993. -----------------------------------------------,Introduction to Law,Yogjakarta:Liberty,2008. Raharjo Satjipto, Elaborating Progressive Law,Jakarta:Kompas Media Nusantara,2007. Sihombing Uli Parulian et all,Challenging the Bakor Pakem,Jakarta:ILRC,2008. Von Benda-Beckmann Franz and Keebet von von Benda-Beckmann,Transnationalisation of Law,Globalisation and Legal Pluralism: A Legal Antropological Perspective, in Dynamic Law : Legal Antropology Perspective,Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia,2009. Wigjosoebroto Soetandyo,Masalah Pluralisme Dalam Pemikiran dan Kebijakan Hukum Nasional:Pengalaman Indoensia, di dalam Untuk Apa Pluralisme Hukum ? Konsep,Regulasi,Negosiasi dalam Konflik Agraria di Indonesia,Jakarta:Human,2011. ----------------------------------,Ragam-Ragam Penelitian Hukum, di dalam Metode Penelitian Hukum Konstelasi dan Refleksi, Yayasan Obir & JHMP FHUI.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Tadulako Law Review

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

statcounter

Flag Counter

 

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.