REALIZING THE LEGAL CERTAINTY OF CALCULATING FINES BUSINESS COMPETITION LAW

Hari Sutra Disemadi, Kholis Roisah, Paramita Prananingtyas

Abstract


The Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) by the Business Competition Law (Law Number 5 Year 1999) has been given the authority to impose sanctions in the form of administrative measures, namely the imposition of administrative fines. The amount is very clearly regulated in the Business Competition Law, which is the lower limit and the upper limit. In fact, prior to the implementation of guidelines for calculating fines, many KPPU’s decisions deviated from the amount of sanctions that have been regulated in the Business Competition Law. Therefore, that will raise questions about the quality of the KPPU’s decision. Even worse, if the public or business actors no longer trust KPPU, because KPPU acts unfairly against other business actors. Not fair, by looking at the disparity in determining the amount of fines imposed. To minimize the foregoing, the issuance of guidelines for calculating fines is expected to overcome the disparity problem in imposing fines on the Reported Party. The issuance of this guideline does not in fact intend to limit the space and independence of the KPPU but will instead assist the KPPU’s tasks.


Keywords


Calculation of Fines; Business Competition Law; Legal Certainty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bradley, M., Desai, A., & Kim, E. H. (1983). The rationale behind interfirm tender offers: Information or synergy?. Journal of financial economics, 11(1-4), 183-206. Disemadi, H. S., & Roisah, K. (2019). The Enforcement of Business Competition Law by the Police of the Republic of Indonesia. Lentera Hukum, 6(2). Hartono, A., Prananingtyas, P., & Mahmudah, S. (2016). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Praktek Dugaan Kartel Di Bidang Industri Ban (Studi Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor 08/KPPU-I/2014). Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(2), 1-14. Kansil, F. I. (2014). Sanksi Pidana Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Menurut Kuhp Dan Di Luar KUHP. Lex Crimen, 3(3), 26-34. Philipus M. Hadjon, et al, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gadjah Mada Universitry Press, Yogyakarta, 2008. Riva’i, M., & Erhandy, D. (2013). Kebijakan Dan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat: Sinergitas Kawasan ASEAN Di Era Globalisasi. Liquidity, 2(2), 195-204. Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2006). Imu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung. Simbolon, A. (2012). Kedudukan Hukum Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Melaksanakan Wewenang Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 24(3), 529-541. Simbolon, A. (2013). Pendekatan yang Dilakukan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Menentukan Pelanggaran dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal, 20(2), 186-206. Tanjung, K., & Siregar, J. (2013). Fungsi dan Peran Lembaga KPPU dalam Praktek Persaingan Usaha di Kota Medan. Jurnal Mercatoria, 6(1), 64-85. Zihaningrum, A., & Kholil, M. (2016). Penegakan Hukum Persekongkolan Tender Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Privat Law, 4(1), 107-116. Undang-Undang : Hukum Online. (2008). KPPU Terbitkan Aturan Teknis Denda dan Ganti Rugi https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol20026/kppu-terbitkan-aturan-teknis-denda-dan-ganti-rugi/ Diakses Tanggal 4 Agustus 2019


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Tadulako Law Review

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

statcounter

 

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.