Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The study used a variety of education, health and recreation standards based on discipline, including instructional models; approach in physical education; Essential Methods in Physical Education; Content and curriculum knowledge in Physical Education; Children and Knowledge in Physical Education; Sport Medicine; sports nutrition; Sports coaching; recreational sports; sports health and other lessons on Physical Education and Sport

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Article Report

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Literature Review

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Tadulako Journal of Sport Science and Physical Education published the only paper strictly following the guidelines and templates of Tadulako Journal Sport Science and Physical Education for the preparation script. All manuscripts submitted will go through review process. The paper is read by an editorial member (in the field of specialization) and will be screened by the Managing Editor to meet the criteria required for publication in the Tadulako Journal Sport Science and Physical Education. The manuscripts will be based on the field of science or on the basis of their area of specialization. Tadulako Journal of Sport Science and Physical Education has reviewed the form to keep the same item reviewed by two reviewers. Then the editorial board makes a decision on the reviewer's comments or suggestions. Reviewers provide an assessment of the originality, clarity of presentations, contributions to the field / science, reviewers have three types of decisions:Accepted, as it is

  • Accepted by Minor Revisions (let authors revised with stipulated time)
  • Accepted by Major Revisions (let authors revised with stipulated time)
  • Rejected (generally, on grounds of outside of scope and aim, major technical description problems, lack of clarity of presentation)

 

For checking Plagiarism, Tadulako Journal Sport Science and Physical Education Editorial Board will screen plagiarism with using Plagiarism Checker X Program. If it is found plagiarism indication (above 30%), editorial board will reject manuscript immediately.

Before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from authors in order to acquire copyrights for papers published in the journal. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.

 

Publication Frequency

This journal is published two times a year (June and December)

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Ethics

Section A: Publication and authorship 

  1. All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.

  2. Review process are blind peer review.

  3. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.

  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.

  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.

  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.

  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.

  8. No research can be included in more than one publication. 

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.

  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.

  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 

  4. Authors must participate in the peer review process. 

  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.

  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.

  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.

  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.

  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.

  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors. 

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information. 

  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author

  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments

  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.

  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.

  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.

  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.

  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.

  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.

  6. Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.

  7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.

  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason. 

  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers. 

  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.

  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.

  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.

  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.

  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.

 

Bibliography Tools

Penulisan Daftar Pustaka menggunakan Aplikasi ZOTERO yaitu style Chicago Manual of Style 17th Edition (Author-Date)

 

Publication Charges

Tadulako Journal Sport Sciences And Physical Education There are no charges for the submission of a manuscript and no charges for article processing, the publication of manuscripts or the color reproduction of photographs, and the Journal does not charge readers or institutions for access. However, printed or reprinted materials are supplied at cost.