https://portalderevistas.uam.edu.ni/files/toponline/ http://210.57.208.166/obctoponline/ https://elitbang.depok.go.id/ https://wonosari.bondowosokab.go.id/pelayanan/ slot gacor situs slot gacor pertanian.bondowosokab.go.id/ https://elitbang.depok.go.id/assets/ https://simaster.wonosobokab.go.id/obc4d/ https://cms-bpsdubm.kemenkumham.go.id/json/ https://elakip2023.slemankab.go.id/modules/obc4d/ https://kinerja.iainambon.ac.id/ https://corinnemartin.com/ https://thedevilsrejects.com/ https://www.ehazira.net/ https://henantwinespirits.com/ https://majormagnetgame.com/ https://grunkamunka.com/ https://villatente.com/ https://exper-tr.com/ https://bkd.iainambon.ac.id/assets/ https://mi.aikom.ac.id/assets/ https://www.gorevdeyukselmesinavi.com.tr/ https://bkad.bengkuluutarakab.go.id/wp-content/themes/ https://compchem.ub.ac.id/ https://pastiberaksi.sulselprov.go.id/sgacor/ https://lihtr.unair.ac.id/assets/ https://geliatairlangga.unair.ac.id/toto/ https://e-kkn.unila.ac.id/assets/ https://simlp2mv2.unm.ac.id/gacor/ https://e-kkn.unila.ac.id/gacor/ https://e-kkn.unila.ac.id/about/ https://pafirembang.com/ https://pafijaktim.org/ https://pafislawi.org/ https://pafilasem.org/ https://dinkes.bondowosokab.go.id/dinkes/x777/ https://guvenlunapark.com/ https://pafikediri.com/ http://macasa.mx/ http://info.andes.edu.mx/ http://uat.sewrob.com/ https://ardpension.com/ https://tubitak2237.usak.edu.tr/storage/pisangtoto/ https://ustech.usak.edu.tr/storage/obcbet/ https://bahanacitapersada.com/ https://ppdb.bahanacitapersada.com/ https://167.71.57.184/ https://159.89.125.203/
PERAN PARA PIHAK TERHADAP KEBERLANJUTAN KESEPAKATAN KONSERVASI MASYARAKAT DI TAMAN NASIONAL LORE LINDU | Massiri | ForestSains

PERAN PARA PIHAK TERHADAP KEBERLANJUTAN KESEPAKATAN KONSERVASI MASYARAKAT DI TAMAN NASIONAL LORE LINDU

Sudirman Daeng Massiri, Bramasto Nugroho, Hariadi Kartodihadjo, Rinekso Soekmadi

Abstract


Management of National Parks cause interdependence of many parties so that required appropriate institutional arrangements. However, the rules which have been designed in an institution often not implemented by stakeholders sustainably. This phenomenon occurs in Lore Lindu National Park (LLNP), in which property rights and the rules of Community Conservation Agreement (CCA) designed since the early 2000s is not implemented by stakeholders in LLNP. This problem situation suspected closely related to the interests, capacity, rights, responsibilities, revenues and relationship between stakeholders in the management of national parks. This research aimed to understand how the interests, capacity, rights, responsibilities, revenues and relationship of the stakeholders affected the performance of CCA. To achieve these objectives, this study was using a stakeholder analysis with 4RS framework (rights, responsibility, revenues and relationship) and analysis of access. This study used qualitative research methods with conduct interviews with key informants to obtain deeply explanation about the role the stakeholders in the agreement. The study found that the high interests of stakeholders to resources of LLNP were land, timber for local need, biodiversity, water and tourism. Local community have high capacity to access gain of resources in LLNP, while the high control access capacity in LLNP were LLNP officer, Village Chiefs, Customary Institutions in homogenous villages and Village Conservation Council/LKD in Rimba zone. However, they did not have high capacity of access maintenance for the use of forest resources. Imbalance of rights, responsibilities and revenues of stakeholders became one the constraints for the sustainability CCA. The relationship between local communities, local institutions to BBTNLL was categorized as poor, even though it has constructed efforts of conservation agreements

Keywords


Lore Lindu National Park, Community Conservation Agreement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anshari GZ. 2006. Dapatkah pengelolaan kolaboratif menyelamatkan taman nasional Danau Sentarum?, Bogor, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

Black JA, Champion DJ. 2009. Metode dan Masalah Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Reflika Aditama.

Bryson JM. 2004. What to do when stakeholders matter: stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public management review 6(1):21-53.

Dubois O. 1989. Capacity to Manage Role Changes in Forestry : Introducing the ‘4Rs’ Framework: International Institute for Environmental and Development (IIED).

Enserink B, Kwakkel J, Bots P, Hermans L, Thissen W, Koppenjan J. 2010. Policy analysis of multi-actor systems: Eleven International Publ.

Irawan P. 2006. Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif untuk Ilmu-Ilmu sosiall. Jakarta: DIA FISIP UI.

Kadir AW, Nurhaedah M, Purwanti R. 2013. Konflik pada kawasan taman nasional Bantimurung Bulusaraung Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan dan upaya penyelesaiannya. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi kehutanan 10(3):186-198.

Kartodihardjo H. 2006. Ekonomi dan Institusi Pengelolaan Hutan. editor. Bogor, Institute for Development Economics of Agronomic and Rural Areas.

Kasper W, Streit ME. 1999. Institutional economics: social order and public policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Ninan KN, Jyothis S, Babu P, Ramakrishnappa. 2007. The Economic of Biodiversity Conservation. London: Earthscan

North DC. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge university press.

Nugroho B, Sukardi D, Widyantoro B. 2012. Studi dan Analisis Peraturan Perundangan Terkait dengan Pengelolaan pada Hutan, Hutan Berbasis Karbon, Penyerapan Karbon, Stok Karbon, dan Produk Ramah Lingkungan. Laporan Teknis, Jakarta, Kementerian Kehutanan RI dan ITTO.

Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Common. New York: Cambidge University Press.

Ostrom E. 2005. Self-governance and forest resources. Terracotta reader: a market approach to the environment. Academic Foundation, New Delhi:131-155.

Petursson JG, Vedeld P, Kaboggoza J. 2011. Transboundary biodiversity management: institutions, local stakeholders, and protected areas: a case study from Mt. Elgon, Uganda and Kenya. Society & Natural Resources 24(12):1304-1321.

Prabowo SA, Basuni S, Suharjito D. 2010. Konflik Tanpa Henti: Permukiman dalam Kawasan Taman Nasional Halimun Salak (Enduring Conflict: Settlement in Halimun-Salak National Park Area). Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 16(3).

Ribot JC, Peluso NL. 2003. A theory of access. Rural sociology 68(2):153-181.

Robbins SP. 2002. Prinsip-prinsip Perilaku Organisasi Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Schmid AA. 1987. Property, power, and public choice: an inquiry into law and economics. United states of America: Praeger.

Sembiring E, Basuni S, Soekmadi R. 2010. Resolusi Konflik Pengelolaan Taman Nasional Teluk Cenderawasih di Kabupaten Teluk Wondama. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 16(2):84-91.

Soekmadi R. 2003. Pergeseran Paradigma Pengelolaan Kawasan Konservasi: Sebuah Wacana Baru Dalam Pengelolaan Kawasan Konservasi. Media Konservasi 3(3):87-93.

Tilman D. 2000. Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature 405(6783):208-211.

Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource managment: Island Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
ForestSains by Forestry Faculty, Tadulako University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/ForestScience.