PROBLEMATICS OF THE SUBJECT OF RECIPIENTS OF LEGAL ASSITANCE IN THE LEGAL ASSISTANCE ACT

Ari Purwita Kartika, Yazid Bustomi

Abstract


The Legal Aid Law has limited the qualifications of legal aid recipients to those of the poor. The question of other groups outside of that is not entitled to legal assistance. This limitation indicates an inconsistency between the explanation and the principles used in the rules. This limitation is also not in accordance with the framework of Bappenas' access to justice strategy, which includes the poor group of people who are oppressed and marginalized not only because of poverty, but because of social conditions they become vulnerable. This research is a normative type using regulations related to interested legal aid as a tool to analyze problems. The approach technique used is the regulatory approach and conceptual approaches. Legal material analysis techniques use prescriptive methods that provide an assessment of what is right or wrong or what should be according to the law. The results of this study indicate, subject subjects that only focus on the social emergence of the poor, unequal recipients of legal aid, chaos in the implementation of providing legal aid which results in inter-statutory rules and not achieving legal ideals. To remedy the problem, greatly improve the overhaul of the existing Legal Aid PP which lays out the criteria for legal aid recipients


Keywords


Inconsistency; Legal Aid; Subject

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angga, Angga, and Ridwan Arifin, ‘Penerapan Bantuan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Kurang Mampu Di Indonesia’, DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum, 4.2 (2019), 218

Damayanti, Aldiastri, ‘Implementasi Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Hidup Masyarakat (Studi Kasus Di Kabupaten Probolinggo)’, Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 2.3 (2016), 15–19

Faddillah, Sean, ‘PELAKSANAAN PEMBERIAN BANTUAN HUKUM SECARA CUMA-CUMA BAGI TERDAKWA YANG TIDAK MAMPU DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SURAKARTA’, RECHTSTAAT, 8.2 (2014), 1–12

Faiz, Pan Mohamad, ‘Teori Keadilan John Rawls (John Rawls’ Theory of Justice)’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 6.1 (2009), 135–49

Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad, DUALISME PENELITIAN HUKUM NORMATIF & EMPIRIS (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2013)

Jamaludin, Nurrun, ‘Strategi Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Dalam Menangani Perkara Perdata Di LKBHI IAIN Salatiga’, Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam, 4.1 (2019), 15

Johan Nasution, Bahder, ‘KAJIAN FILOSOFIS TENTANG KONSEP KEADILAN DARI PEMIKIRAN KLASIK SAMPAI PEMIKIRAN MODERN’, Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 3.2 (2014)

LBH Jakarta, ‘Pemberdayaan Hukum Untuk Kaum Tertindas’, BantuanHukum.or.Id, 2014

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Buku Penelitian Hukum, Revisi (Jakarta: PRENADAMEDIA GROUP, 2017)

Prastyo, Brian Amy, ‘PRINSIP KEADILAN SOSIAL SEBAGAI HUKUM’, Jurnal Ius, 1.3 (2013), 415–30

Sahadi Humaedi, Budi Wibowo, Santoso Tri Raharjo, ‘KELOMPOK RENTAN DAN KEBUTUHANNYA (Sebuah Kajian Hasil Pemetaan Sosial CSR PT Indonesia Power UPJP Kamojang)’, Share: Social Work Jurnal, 10.1 (2020), 61–72

Sihombing, Eka N.A.M., ‘Eksistensi Paralegal Dalam Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Miskin’, Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 6.1 (2019), 70

Vestwansan Dipa Prasetya, Mexsasai Indra, Widia Edorita, ‘KEDUDUKAN SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN’, JOM Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, 7.1 (2020), 1–15

Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia Surabaya dan Yayasan TIFA, Buku Saku: Hak-Hak Tersangka Yang Perlu Anda Ketahui (Surabaya: Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia Surabaya dan Yayasan TIFA, 2018)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Tadulako Law Review

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

statcounter

Flag Counter

 

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.